1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
|
% Compare various inference engines on the following network (from Jensen (1996) p84 fig 4.17)
% 1
% / | \
% 2 3 4
% | | |
% 5 6 7
% \/ \/
% 8 9
% where all arcs point downwards
N = 9;
dag = zeros(N,N);
dag(1,2)=1; dag(1,3)=1; dag(1,4)=1;
dag(2,5)=1; dag(3,6)=1; dag(4,7)=1;
dag(5,8)=1; dag(6,8)=1; dag(6,9)=1; dag(7,9) = 1;
gauss = 1;
if gauss
ns = ones(1,N); % scalar nodes
ns(1) = 2;
ns(9) = 3;
dnodes = [];
else
ns = 2*ones(1,N); % binary nodes
dnodes = 1:N;
end
bnet = mk_bnet(dag, ns, 'discrete', dnodes);
% use random params
for i=1:N
if gauss
bnet.CPD{i} = gaussian_CPD(bnet, i);
else
bnet.CPD{i} = tabular_CPD(bnet, i);
end
end
engines = {};
engines{1} = jtree_inf_engine(bnet);
engines{2} = stab_cond_gauss_inf_engine(bnet);
[err, time] = cmp_inference_static(bnet, engines);
|
