diff options
| author | ziejd2 | 2018-03-14 23:23:33 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub | 2018-03-14 23:23:33 -0500 |
| commit | 1ff6baa44e22b91eefb48aea6f3befa078c0489b (patch) | |
| tree | e0fd79d2e32fd2aedda2eadaed0f19af3514c520 /sourcecodes/bnt-master/docs/matlab_comparison.html | |
| parent | 6882395afdadf4e982b25b5215071a0932730950 (diff) | |
| parent | c80226899f5cdd9f11c163817d59445213f5bef0 (diff) | |
| download | BNW-1ff6baa44e22b91eefb48aea6f3befa078c0489b.tar.gz | |
Merge pull request #1 from ziejd2/octave_php_separate
Octave php separate
Diffstat (limited to 'sourcecodes/bnt-master/docs/matlab_comparison.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | sourcecodes/bnt-master/docs/matlab_comparison.html | 62 |
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sourcecodes/bnt-master/docs/matlab_comparison.html b/sourcecodes/bnt-master/docs/matlab_comparison.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bdf75aae --- /dev/null +++ b/sourcecodes/bnt-master/docs/matlab_comparison.html @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +<html> <head> +<title>Comparison of Matlab, R/S/Splus, Gauss, etc.</title> +</head> + +<body> +<!--<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> --> + +<h1>Comparison of Matlab, R/S/Splus, Gauss, etc.</h1> + +<ul> +<li> <a href="http://www.scientificweb.com/ncrunch/">Comparison of +mathematical programs for data analysis</a>, +Stefan Steinhaus, tech report, 2000. +<br> +This is a very detailed comparison of features and speed of several +interactive scientific programming environments, e.g. Matlab, +Mathematica, Splus. + + +<!-- +<p> +<li> <a href="Papers/gauss.econ.review.ps">Econometric +programming environments: Gauss, Ox and S-PLUS</a>, +Francisco Cribari-Neto. +J. of Applied Econometrics, 12(1):77-89, 1997 +<br> +Ox can not be used interactively, and has a C-style syntax (it even +requires users to pre-declare variables!). Its only advantage is speed. +S-Plus has tons of features and good documentation, but is slow. +Gauss is somewhere in between. + + +<p> +<li> <a href="Papers/matlab.econ.review.ps">MATLAB as an econometric +programming environment</a>, +Francisco Cribari-Neto and Mark J. Jensen. +J. of Applied Econometrics, 12(6):735-432, 1997. +<br> +The basic conclusion is that Matlab has excellent graphics and +sparse-matrix facilities, but is slower than Gauss/Ox (especially on +code +with loops), and has few statistical routines built-in (one must buy the +stats toolbox). + + + +<p> +<li> <a href="Papers/R.econ.review.ps">R: Yet another econometric +programming environment</a>, +Francisco Cribari-Neto and S. Zarkos. +J. of Applied Econometrics, 14(3):319-329, 1999. +<br> +The basic conclusion is that R is much faster than Splus on +code with loops, but a little bit slower on vectorized code. (Gauss/ +Ox is much faster than both; in my experience, R and Matlab have about +the same speed.) +However, R has much better memory management than Splus, and R is free. Otherwise, R/S/Splus +are essentially the same. +--> + + +</ul> |