summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/issues/effect-size-for-gemma-is-a-must.gmi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'issues/effect-size-for-gemma-is-a-must.gmi')
-rw-r--r--issues/effect-size-for-gemma-is-a-must.gmi10
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/issues/effect-size-for-gemma-is-a-must.gmi b/issues/effect-size-for-gemma-is-a-must.gmi
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..137e96e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/issues/effect-size-for-gemma-is-a-must.gmi
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# Effect size for GEMMA is a MUST
+
+To: @Zach, @Pjotr
+From: robwwilliams
+Regarding: Getting a readout of effect size and polarity of effect from GEMMA
+Request Type: New feature for GEMMA, User requires these data
+
+Main Message: Let's Just Do It. Can be done as a kludge. Just plot the beta of the regression equation of the SNP status (ususally two or three states codes as 0, 1, 2 or -1,0, +1) against the phenotype.
+The slope is roughly the effect size. This is good enough for most users. The only got-you is slight inflation of due to kinship structure and the Beavis effect when the sample size is low.
+QUESTION—can I upload an image from Amelie Baud's talk on effect size?