diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | issues/modelling-phenotype-data.gmi | 52 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/issues/modelling-phenotype-data.gmi b/issues/modelling-phenotype-data.gmi index b6deca6..2d183f4 100644 --- a/issues/modelling-phenotype-data.gmi +++ b/issues/modelling-phenotype-data.gmi @@ -106,32 +106,32 @@ Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) IL6 response of peritoneal macrophages in vitro (overnig Date: TBA -* We have inconsistent data as pointed above. What are peoples comments about it? +### We have inconsistent data as pointed above. What are peoples comments about it? -- Provide Rob list of traits that are hanging. -- PMIDs embedded in abstract - rare occurence. -- Data may appear to be the same; but vary slightly e.g. different units -- Quality of curation is poor. People generally don't worry about their old data. +* Provide Rob list of traits that are hanging. +* PMIDs embedded in abstract - rare occurence. +* Data may appear to be the same; but vary slightly e.g. different units +* Quality of curation is poor. People generally don't worry about their old data. Good curation: good description. -* How do we handle private/public data and metadata? Data is the vectors of numbers; metadata include pre/post publication/abbreviation. Is there a difference between the terms confidential public when it comes to storing data? - -- Mouse data more than 4 y/o. -- Scientists -> story tellers. -- Competitors - people hoard data. GN storing private data, and access goes through channels. People care about metadata to hide what they are working on. - -* Given the above problem, what's the FAIR way to go about it? How do we allow sharing data that even encourages the paranoid? - -- Good authentication/authorization. -- People upload temp data. Give the paranoid the ability to hide data within GN. After they publish, they can make it public. -- When there's a pubmed-id, the data is public. -- Communicating with authors is a hassle. -- Provide a DOI for people before publishing. -- Temp traits upload page could add "encourage" people? Discourage people from temp traits I.e. Limit temp traits. -- Expire temp traits. -- Make assumptions GN makes about data (E.g. all pmid data is public) explicit. -- Eventually, all data will be public in the context of GN. -- Getting higher quality data in GN (priority). Make contributors feel secure. -- For private data, expose the pre-publication data. -- Pre, post, published data with a tag of whether private or public and share with Rob/Arthur (in ms word). -- Full time expert curator. Automating this. +### How do we handle private/public data and metadata? Data is the vectors of numbers; metadata include pre/post publication/abbreviation. Is there a difference between the terms confidential public when it comes to storing data? + +* Mouse data more than 4 y/o. +* Scientists -> story tellers. +* Competitors - people hoard data. GN storing private data, and access goes through channels. People care about metadata to hide what they are working on. + +### Given the above problem, what's the FAIR way to go about it? How do we allow sharing data that even encourages the paranoid? + +* Good authentication/authorization. +* People upload temp data. Give the paranoid the ability to hide data within GN. After they publish, they can make it public. +* When there's a pubmed-id, the data is public. +* Communicating with authors is a hassle. +* Provide a DOI for people before publishing. +* Temp traits upload page could add "encourage" people? Discourage people from temp traits I.e. Limit temp traits. +* Expire temp traits. +* Make assumptions GN makes about data (E.g. all pmid data is public) explicit. +* Eventually, all data will be public in the context of GN. +* Getting higher quality data in GN (priority). Make contributors feel secure. +* For private data, expose the pre-publication data. +* Pre, post, published data with a tag of whether private or public and share with Rob/Arthur (in ms word). +* Full time expert curator. Automating this. |