Improve formatting on phenotype modelling issue

Signed-off-by: Munyoki Kilyungi <me@bonfacemunyoki.com>

1 files changed, 26 insertions, 26 deletions

diff --git a/issues/modelling-phenotype-data.gmi b/issues/modelling-phenotype-data.gmi
index b6deca6..2d183f4 100644
--- a/issues/modelling-phenotype-data.gmi
+++ b/issues/modelling-phenotype-data.gmi
@@ -106,32 +106,32 @@ Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) IL6 response of peritoneal macrophages in vitro (overnig
 
 Date: TBA
 
-* We have inconsistent data as pointed above.  What are peoples comments about it?
+### We have inconsistent data as pointed above.  What are peoples comments about it?
 
-- Provide Rob list of traits that are hanging.
-- PMIDs embedded in abstract - rare occurence.
-- Data may appear to be the same; but vary slightly e.g. different units
-- Quality of curation is poor.  People generally don't worry about their old data.
+* Provide Rob list of traits that are hanging.
+* PMIDs embedded in abstract - rare occurence.
+* Data may appear to be the same; but vary slightly e.g. different units
+* Quality of curation is poor.  People generally don't worry about their old data.
 Good curation: good description.
 
-* How do we handle private/public data and metadata?  Data is the vectors of numbers; metadata include pre/post publication/abbreviation.  Is there a difference between the terms confidential public when it comes to storing data?
-
-- Mouse data more than 4 y/o.
-- Scientists -> story tellers.
-- Competitors - people hoard data.  GN storing private data, and access goes through channels.  People care about metadata to hide what they are working on.
-
-* Given the above problem, what's the FAIR way to go about it?  How do we allow sharing data that even encourages the paranoid?
-
-- Good authentication/authorization.
-- People upload temp data.  Give the paranoid the ability to hide data within GN.  After they publish, they can make it public.
-- When there's a pubmed-id, the data is public.
-- Communicating with authors is a hassle.
-- Provide a DOI for people before publishing.
-- Temp traits upload page could add "encourage" people?  Discourage people from temp traits I.e. Limit temp traits.
-- Expire temp traits.
-- Make assumptions GN makes about data (E.g. all pmid data is public) explicit.
-- Eventually, all data will be public in the context of GN.
-- Getting higher quality data in GN (priority).  Make contributors feel secure.
-- For private data, expose the pre-publication data.
-- Pre, post, published data with a tag of whether private or public and share with Rob/Arthur (in ms word).
-- Full time expert curator.  Automating this.
+### How do we handle private/public data and metadata?  Data is the vectors of numbers; metadata include pre/post publication/abbreviation.  Is there a difference between the terms confidential public when it comes to storing data?
+
+* Mouse data more than 4 y/o.
+* Scientists -> story tellers.
+* Competitors - people hoard data.  GN storing private data, and access goes through channels.  People care about metadata to hide what they are working on.
+
+### Given the above problem, what's the FAIR way to go about it?  How do we allow sharing data that even encourages the paranoid?
+
+* Good authentication/authorization.
+* People upload temp data.  Give the paranoid the ability to hide data within GN.  After they publish, they can make it public.
+* When there's a pubmed-id, the data is public.
+* Communicating with authors is a hassle.
+* Provide a DOI for people before publishing.
+* Temp traits upload page could add "encourage" people?  Discourage people from temp traits I.e. Limit temp traits.
+* Expire temp traits.
+* Make assumptions GN makes about data (E.g. all pmid data is public) explicit.
+* Eventually, all data will be public in the context of GN.
+* Getting higher quality data in GN (priority).  Make contributors feel secure.
+* For private data, expose the pre-publication data.
+* Pre, post, published data with a tag of whether private or public and share with Rob/Arthur (in ms word).
+* Full time expert curator.  Automating this.