diff options
author | Pjotr Prins | 2022-08-26 05:52:42 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Pjotr Prins | 2022-08-26 05:52:42 -0500 |
commit | a6299a491b89d45c5d43d4044ecdc2e5e351cfdd (patch) | |
tree | 2c952d4179431f3ddaab5219a7f362def25ccc11 | |
parent | f3d4e05fc859920ee2311116573dd8cfd3438fc2 (diff) | |
download | gn-gemtext-a6299a491b89d45c5d43d4044ecdc2e5e351cfdd.tar.gz |
One GeneWiki
-rw-r--r-- | issues/genenetwork/genewiki.gmi | 37 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/issues/genenetwork/genewiki.gmi b/issues/genenetwork/genewiki.gmi index e0a0a00..ce54afb 100644 --- a/issues/genenetwork/genewiki.gmi +++ b/issues/genenetwork/genewiki.gmi @@ -25,3 +25,40 @@ with an edit button, similar to * keywords: GN1, documentation ## Tasks + +* [ ] Export Genewiki to markdown - one file per gene and store in git@github.com:genenetwork/gn-docs.git +* [ ] Format output for GN using markdown parser (similar to other docs) +* [ ] Provide edit link to github + +Later we'll add automated links to wikidata and Uniprot etc. + +## Notes + +Zach writes: How exactly do we want to store all of this? It appears to currently be +stored across three SQL tables - GeneRIF, GeneRIFXRef, and GeneCategory. +The first contains a row for each item a user adds (when displaying all +items it queries by gene symbol), and the latter two are for storing the +checkbox stuff (so there will presumably be a row in GeneRIFXRef for every +checked box for each symbol, though this isn't totally clear to me because +it's linked by GeneRIF.Id - which isn't unique - rather than GeneRIF.symbol +which is what I would have assumed). + +IIRC the issue I ran into (that isn't immediately apparent from looking at +the web page) is that it's currently stored as a list of items. There isn't +a single "free text" area - when a user edits they are either adding a new +text item with its own row in the DB or editing one of the existing items, +so I'm not sure how best to reasonably convert the current contents and +editing method to markdown. Currently it doesn't even support any sort of +user styling/formatting - users just enter basic text into a form. And if +they were converted to markdown, how would we be storing the checkbox +content? + +It's probably possible to write a script that goes through those tables and +generates a bunch of markdown files from them (one for each gene symbol, I +think?), with the list of items just being converted into a single markdown +file with those items formatted into a list. This would de-link GN1's +GeneWiki from GN2's in the future, though (since the way things are stored +would be fundamentally changed). + +Pj: That is what we want. Create a markdown file for each gene symbol. +Checklist can be part of that using markdown syntax. |