summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorjgart2021-10-21 23:31:40 -0400
committerjgart2021-10-21 23:31:40 -0400
commit3adb467dbf239d12b2e5476abd44ab3d0ac1df57 (patch)
treea1d7bdf6e8c8424f33dbe6b543714f7261da079d
parent352d9f223a811f49120003397b34f8d13fec17e9 (diff)
downloadgn-gemtext-3adb467dbf239d12b2e5476abd44ab3d0ac1df57.tar.gz
Add QC project
-rw-r--r--topics/quality-control/qc.gmi33
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/topics/quality-control/qc.gmi b/topics/quality-control/qc.gmi
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..96c4604
--- /dev/null
+++ b/topics/quality-control/qc.gmi
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Quality Control Project
+
+Develop an app with a web interface to automate the job of cleaning tsv data
+files for entry. The app would be used by a group of users on a network to
+upload data.
+
+QC should be embedded functionality of the data uploader that Bonface has written.
+
+* Upload data through REST API - it goes into a temp dir for a user (data is in
+ escrow) - Bonface wrote this already
+* Run QC - what Arthur proposes (start here)
+* Show results - run tools (hard part!)
+* User can say - please accept data (Bonface wrote this)
+* Curator accepts data (different person!) (Bonface wrote this)
+* Data gets piped into GN proper
+
+The QC step consists of
+
+* Standard checks - some GN tools, such as outliers
+* Run mapping
+
+So, even though the data is in 'escrow' we should be able to use it as
+something that is in the database. GN1 does some of that. This is
+where Arun comes in - we need to have a common handler for data that
+is in the database and data that is in escrow. My idea is that this
+will all be text files (truth files). A simple first QC step is to
+check that all fields in the table are numbers where should be. Not
+text.
+
+Note we could run QC through the REST API too. That would allow it to
+be run from R and Python and Jupyter notebooks. Make it part of GN3.
+
+The tricky part is still how the data is handled in escrow.