From e34e7da50fc0ff5ed41e8bdaf2b1d41c9e9cf534 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bonface Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 06:09:54 -0600 Subject: Update dataset RTF Files. --- general/datasets/Hipp_Illumina_RankInv_0507/processing.rtf | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 general/datasets/Hipp_Illumina_RankInv_0507/processing.rtf (limited to 'general/datasets/Hipp_Illumina_RankInv_0507/processing.rtf') diff --git a/general/datasets/Hipp_Illumina_RankInv_0507/processing.rtf b/general/datasets/Hipp_Illumina_RankInv_0507/processing.rtf deleted file mode 100644 index 678856e..0000000 --- a/general/datasets/Hipp_Illumina_RankInv_0507/processing.rtf +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -
-- -All data links (right-most column above) will be made active as soon as the global analysis of these data has been accepted for publication. Please see text on Data Sharing Policies, and Conditions and Limitations, and Contacts. Following publication, download a summary text file or Excel file of data. Please contact Dr. Lu Lu if you have any questions on the use of these open data.
-
--- cgit v1.2.3This data set uses the standard Rank Invariant method developed by Illumina and described in their BeadStation Studio documentation.
- -Sex of the samples was validated using sex-specific probe set: Xist (probe ILM106520068, also known as scl00213742.1_141-S).
- - - -Legend: Checking that the sex of samples was labeled correctly in mouse array data sets using Xist expression measured by probe ILM106520068. In this bar chart the expression of Xist is very low in LXS114 and has a low error term. This is because both arrays are male samples rather than 1 male and 1 female sample. In contrast LXS34 has very high expression and no error bar because the sample is from a single female pool.
-