From 24f924eb936ce38f6193377fdd8b0db16b2540de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederick Muriuki Muriithi
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 15:17:24 -0500
Subject: Add more requirements to issue.

---
 issues/gn-auth/problems-with-roles.gmi | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'issues')

diff --git a/issues/gn-auth/problems-with-roles.gmi b/issues/gn-auth/problems-with-roles.gmi
index f34a855..6c124e4 100644
--- a/issues/gn-auth/problems-with-roles.gmi
+++ b/issues/gn-auth/problems-with-roles.gmi
@@ -25,8 +25,10 @@ The implementation should instead, tie the roles to the specific resource, rathe
 
 * [x] Remove the `….create_action` function: raise exception when used
 * [x] Remove the "Roles" page on the UI
-* [ ] migration: Remove `group:role:[create|delete|edit]-role` privileges from `group-admin` role
+* [ ] migration: Remove `group:role:[create|delete|edit]-role` privileges from `group-leader` role
 * [ ] migration: Add `resource:role:[create|delete|edit]-role` privileges to `resource-owner` role
+* [ ] migration: Create new `resource_roles` db table linking each resource to roles that can act on it, and the user that created the role
+* [ ] migration: Drop table `group_roles` deleting all data: data here could already have privilege escalation in place
 * [ ] Create a new "Roles" section on the "Resource-View" page, or a separate "Resource-Roles" page to handle the management of that resource's roles
 * [ ] Ensure user can only assign roles they have created - maybe?
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3