Data were generated with funds contributed equally by The UTHSC-SJCRH Cerebellum Transcriptome Profiling Consortium. Our members include: +diff --git a/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/cases.rtf b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/cases.rtf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f5e6bdf --- /dev/null +++ b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/cases.rtf @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ ++
+- Tom Curran
+- Dan Goldowitz
+- Kristin Hamre
+- Lu Lu
+- Peter McKinnon
+- James Morgan
+- Clayton Naeve
+- Richard Smeyne
+- Robert W. Williams
+- The Center of Genomics and Bioinformatics at UTHSC
+- The Hartwell Center at SJCRH
+
We have exploited a set of BXD recombinant inbred strains. The parental strains from which all BXD lines are derived are C57BL/6J (B6 or B) and DBA/2J (D2 or D). Both B and D strains have been almost fully sequence (8x coverage for B6 by a public consortium and approximately 1.5x coverage for D by Celera Discovery Systems). Chromosomes of the two parental strains have been recombined and fixed randomly in the many different BXD strains. BXD2 through BXD32 were produced by Benjamin A. Taylor starting in the late 1970s. BXD33 through 42 were also produced by Taylor, but they were generated in the 1990s. These strains are all available from The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine. ++ ++ +
In this mRNA expression data set we generally used progeny of stock obtained from The Jackson Laboratory between 1999 and 2001. Animals were generated in-house at the University of Alabama by John Mountz and Hui-Chen Hsu and at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center by Lu Lu and Robert Williams.
+
The set of mouse strains used for mapping (a mapping panel) consists of groups of genetically unique BXD recombinant inbred strains. The ancestral strains from which all BXD lines are derived are C57BL/6J (B6 or B) and DBA/2J (D2 or D). Both B and D strains have been almost fully sequence (8x coverage for B6, and 1.5x coverage for D by Celera Genomics). Chromosomes of the two parental strains are recombined randomly in the many different BXD strains. BXD lines 2 through 32 were produced by Dr. Benjamin Taylor starting in the late 1970s. BXD33 through 42 were also produced by Dr. Taylor, but they were generated in the 1990s. All of these strains are available from The Jackson Laboratory. Lines such as BXD67, BXD68, etc. are BXD Advanced recombinant inbred strains that are part of a large set now being produced by Drs. Lu Lu, Guomin Zhou, Lee Silver, Jeremy Peirce, and Robert Williams. There will eventually be 45 of these BXD strains. For additional background on recombinant inbred strains, please see http://www.nervenet.org/papers/bxn.html.diff --git a/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/notes.rtf b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/notes.rtf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5d4ac24 --- /dev/null +++ b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/notes.rtf @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +
+diff --git a/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/platform.rtf b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/platform.rtf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..188038b --- /dev/null +++ b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/platform.rtf @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +This text file originally generated by RWW and YHQ, September 2003. Updated by RWW, October 30, 2004.
+
Affymetrix Mouse Expression 430 GeneChip set: The expression data were generated using 430A and 430B arrays. Chromosomal positions of probe sets were determined by BLAT analysis of concatenated probe sequences using the Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium May 2004 (mm5) assembly. This BLAT analysis is performed periodically by Yanhua Qu as each new build of the mouse genome is released (see http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgBlat?command=start&org=mouse). We thank Yan Cui (UTHSC) for allowing us to use his Linux cluster to perform this analysis. It is possiible to confirm the BLAT alignment results yourself simply by clicking on the Verify link in the Trait Data and Editing Form (right side of the Location line). +diff --git a/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/processing.rtf b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/processing.rtf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cdfa27a --- /dev/null +++ b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/processing.rtf @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ ++
Probe (cell) level data from the CEL file: These CEL values produced by GCOS are 75% quantiles from a set of 91 pixel values per cell. ++ ++
+Probe set data from the CHP file: These CHP files were generated using MAS 5. The same simple steps described above were also applied to these values. A 1-unit difference represents roughly a 2-fold difference in expression level. Expression levels below 5 are close to the noise level.- Step 1: We added a constant offset of 1 to the CEL expression values for each cell to ensure that all values could be logged without generating negative values.
+- Step 2: We took the log2 of each cell signal level.
+- Step 3: We computed the Z scores for each cell within its array.
+- Step 4: We multiplied all Z scores by 2.
+- Step 5: We added 8 to the value of all Z scores. The consequence of this simple set of transformations is to produce a set of Z scores that have a mean of 8 units, a variance of 4 units, and a standard deviation of 2 units.
+- Step 6a: The 430A and 430B GeneChips include a set of 100 shared probe sets that have identical sequences. These 100 probe sets and 2200 probes provide a good way to adjust expression of the two GeneChips to a common scale. The absolute mean expression on the 430B array is almost invariably lower than that on the 430A array (the A array contains the more commonly expressed transcripts). To bring the two arrays into numerical alignment, we regressed Z scores of the common set of 2200 probes to obtain linear regression corrections to rescale the 430B arrays to values that match the 430A array. This involved multiplying all 430B Z scores by the slope of the regression and adding a very small offset (the regression intercept). The result of this adjustment is that the mean of the 430A array expression is fixed at a value of 8, whereas that of the 430B chip is typically 7.
+- Step 6b: We recentered the entire combined set of 430A and 430B transcripts to a mean of 8 and a standard deviation of 2. This involves reapplying Steps 3 through 5 above but now using the entire set of probes and probe sets from a merged 430A and B data set.
+- Step 7: No batch correction was applied.
+- Step 8: Finally, we compute the arithmetic mean of the values for the set of microarrays for each strain. In this data set we have only a very modest number of replicates and for this reason we do not yet provide error terms for transcripts or probes. Note, that this data set does not provide any correction for variance introduced by differences in sex, age, tissue source, or any interaction terms. We have not corrected for background beyond the background correction implemented by Affymetrix in generating the CEL file. We expect to add statistical controls and adjustments for these variables in subsequent versions of WebQTL.
+
About the chromosome and megabase position values:
+ +The chromosomal locations of probe sets and gene markers on the 430A and 430B microarrays were determined by BLAT analysis using the Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium Oct 2003 Assembly (see http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgBlat?command=start&org=mouse). We thank Yan Cui (UTHSC) for allowing us to use his Linux cluster to perform this analysis.diff --git a/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/summary.rtf b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/summary.rtf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8a59cc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/summary.rtf @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +
+diff --git a/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/tissue.rtf b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/tissue.rtf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4f8e5ed --- /dev/null +++ b/general/datasets/CB_M_1004_M/tissue.rtf @@ -0,0 +1,376 @@ +This October 2003 freeze provides estimates of mRNA expression in cerebellum of 26 adult BXD recombinant inbred strains, as well as C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, and their F1 hybrid, measured using the Affymetrix M430A and B microarrays. Data were generated by a small consortium of investigators at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJ) and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UT). Data were processed using the Microarray Suite 5 (<a data-cke-saved-href="http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/whitepapers/sadd_whitepaper.pdf" href="http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/whitepapers/sadd_whitepaper.pdf" _blank"="" class="fs14">MAS 5) protocol of Affymetrix. To simplify comparison between transforms, MAS 5 values of each array were adjusted to an average of 8 units and a variance of 2 units. This data set was run in two large batches with careful consideration to balancing samples by sex and age. Eighteen strains have been profiled using two or three independent samples. All other strains were sampled once.
+
++ +The October 2003 data set was processed in two large batches. The first batch (the May 2003 data set) consists of 20 pooled samples from 20 strains run on pairs of Affymetrix 430A and 430B arrays (40 arrays total). The second batch consists of 29 samples, included may biological replicates, 2 technical replicates, and data for 9 new strains. Each individual array experiment involved a pool of whole cerebellum taken from three adult animals of the same age and sex. The age range may look broad, but translated into human terms corresponds to a range from about 20 years to 50 years.
+ +RNA was extracted at UTHSC by Zhiping Jia and Hongtao Zhai.
+ +All samples were subsequently processed at the Hartwell Center Affymetrix laboratory at SJCRH by Jay Morris.
+
The January04 data were processed in two large batches. The first batch (the May03 data set) consisted of samples from 20 samples and 20 strains run on Affymetrix MOE 430A and MOE430B GeneChip pairs (40 arrays total). The second batch of 29 samples, included may biological replicates, 2 technical replicates, and data for 9 new strains. Each individual array experiment involved a pool of brain tissue (intact whole cerebellum) taken from three adult animals usually of the same age. RNA was extracted at UTHSC and all samples were processed at the Hartwell Center (SJCRH, Memphis). We will eventually achieve a sample with good, but not perfect, balance of samples by sex and age. The age range may look broad, but translated into human terms corresponds to a range from about 20 years to 50 years.+ +
The table below summarizes informaton on strain, sex, age, sample name, and batch number.+ +
+-- cgit v1.2.3+ +
++ + ++ ++ +
++ +Strain +Sex +Age +SampleID +Batch ++ +B6D2F1 +M +127 +766-C1 +2 ++ +B6D2F1 +M +94 +S347-1C1 +1 ++ +C57BL/6J +F +116 +773-C1 +2 ++ +C57BL/6J +M +109 +S054-1C2 +1 ++ +DBA/2J +F +71 +S175-1C1 +1 ++ +DBA/2J +F +91 +782-C1 +2 ++ +BXD1 +F +57 +813-C1 +2 ++ +BXD2 +F +142 +751-C1 +1 ++ +BXD2 +F +78 +774-C1 +2 ++ +BXD5 +F +56 +802-C1 +2 ++ +BXD5 +M +71 +752-C1 +1 ++ +BXD6 +F +92 +719-C1 +1 ++ +BXD8 +F +72 +S173-1C1 +1 ++ +BXD9 +M +86 +737-C1 +1 ++ +BXD11 +F +441 +S200-1C1 +1 ++ +BXD11 +M +92 +790-C1 +2 ++ +BXD12 +F +130 +776-C1 +2 ++ +BXD12 +M +64 +756-C1 +2 ++ +BXD14 +F +190 +794-C1 +2 ++ +BXD14 +M +91 +758-C1 +2 ++ +BXD16 +F +163 +750-C1 +1 ++ +BXD19 +F +61 +772-C1 +2 ++ +BXD21 +F +116 +711-C1 +1 ++ +BXD21 +M +64 +803-C1 +2 ++ +BXD22 +F +65 +S174-1C1 +1 ++ +BXD23 +F +88 +814-C1 +2 ++ +BXD24 +F +71 +805-C1 +2 ++ +BXD24 +M +71 +759-C1 +2 ++ +BXD25 +M +90 +S429-1C1 +1 ++ +BXD28 +F +113 +785-C1 +2 ++ +BXD28 +F +427 +S203-1C1 +1 ++ +BXD29 +F +82 +777-C1 +2 ++ +BXD29 +M +76 +714-C1 +2 ++ +BXD29 +M +76 +714-C1 +1 ++ +BXD31 +F +142 +816-C1 +2 ++ +BXD32 +F +62 +778-C1 +2 ++ +BXD32 +M +218 +786-C1 +2 ++ +BXD33 +F +184 +793-C1 +2 ++ +BXD33 +M +124 +715-C1 +1 ++ +BXD34 +F +56 +725-C1 +1 ++ +BXD34 +M +91 +789-C1 +2 ++ +BXD38 +F +55 +781-C1 +2 ++ +BXD38 +M +65 +761-C1 +2 ++ +BXD39 +M +165 +723-C1 +1 ++ +BXD40 +F +56 +718-C1 +1 ++ +BXD40 +F +56 +718-C1 +2 ++ +BXD40 +M +73 +812-C1 +2 ++ +BXD42 +F +100 +799-C1 +2 ++ + +BXD42 +M +97 +709-C1 +1 +